Buying a vacuum cleaner is not an easy task; too many models with a wide range of features are on the market. Which vacuum cleaner is best to buy for a home? Our choice of the suitable option will help our rating of vacuum cleaners for the home in 2016. It covers only vacuum cleaners that have received the highest consumer rating and positive reviews on Yandex.Market.
10. Thomas TWIN Panther
- The average price is 11 509 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry and wet.
Good vacuum cleaner for home. Thomas product reviews are rarely negative, the brand has been manufacturing vacuum cleaners for a long time and knows how to please customers. This model has a dust bag and several nozzles (for furniture, for crevices, for floor and carpet, etc.). An additional plus is the possibility of vertical parking. Power - 1600 watts.
Disadvantages - weight (8.4 kg).
9. LG VK69461N
- The average price is 5 105 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
Lightweight (4.5 kg) and powerful (1600 W) vacuum cleaner with a cyclone filter. It perfectly collects garbage, pet hair and does not make much noise.
Cons: poor patency on carpets.
8. Thomas TWIN T1 Aquafilter
- The average price is 15 801 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry and wet.
Here is another model from the Thomas brand included in the rating of vacuum cleaners for quality and reliability in 2016. The vacuum cleaner is equipped with an aquafilter, and its power consumption is equal to 1600 watts. There is vertical parking and a dust bag full indicator.
Disadvantages: heavy (8.4 kg), longer to wash than to vacuum.
7. Karcher DS 6.000
- The average price is 20 568 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
Maneuverable, well-made, the best vacuum cleaner with an aquafilter of 2016. Power - 900 watts. There is the possibility of vertical parking.
Disadvantages: for such a price, a manufacturer could add power adjustment to his brainchild. And consumables are not cheap.
6. Samsung SC4140
- The average price is 4 470 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
Given the price, this is the best vacuum cleaner for the home. He did not lead the rating of 2016 due to the small number of nozzles (for floors and crevices) and the inconvenience of shaking out the fabric filter. But the model has a lot of advantages: lightweight, reliable, powerful (1600 W), sucks dust well. And it’s easy to assemble and disassemble.
5. Philips FC 8471
- The average price is 6,130 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
A small but powerful vacuum cleaner (1700 W) with a cyclone filter. Convenient and understandable even for older people (with two buttons you will not miss). It sucks everything up, remove the scattered things from the floor.
Disadvantages: not very comfortable handle, noisy.
4. Karcher WD 2
- The average price is 4,990 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
This lightweight vacuum cleaner with a cyclone filter / bag for collecting dust at 12 liters blows air into the floor. Consider this fact when cleaning very dusty rooms. A power of 1200 W is enough to clean a small apartment. As they say in one of the reviews, "Karcher does not know how not to suck."
Disadvantages: move carefully, easy to tip over.
3. Karcher WD 3 Premium
- The average price is 7,000 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
An inconspicuous-looking “bucket with legs” consumes 1,400 watts and vacuums like a beast. A huge 17-liter bag / cyclone filter will contain both rubbish and animal hair and even small stones left after the repair. Included are several nozzles.
Cons: short hose.
2. Samsung SC4520
- The average price is 4 786 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
The role of the bag for collecting dust performs a cyclone filter. The power of this vacuum cleaner is 1600 watts. It is easy to disassemble and clean, quite light (4.3 kg) and perfectly cleans carpets.
Disadvantages: you need to wash the cyclone filter after cleaning each room. Otherwise, the suction power will drop.
1. Samsung SC6573
- The average price is 7,770 rubles.
- Cleaning: dry.
Why is this model leading the best vacuum cleaners of 2016? It is very powerful (1800 W), with a convenient cyclone filter, easy to clean, has a presentable appearance, is equipped with a convenient handle with a power regulator. And another plus: inexpensive consumables.
Cons: you need to wash the cyclone filter after cleaning.
